Blur, a four-month-old NFT marketplace, has recently surpassed OpenSea as the market leader in terms of the trading volume. However, concerns about the legitimacy of Blur's trading volume have emerged, with CryptoSlam accusing the platform of market manipulation.
Blur's rise to prominence has been attributed to its polished interface, robust analytical tools, swift trade execution capabilities, and zero platform fees. However, the competition among NFT marketplaces has raised questions about fees and royalties, negatively affecting the NFT ecosystem.
CryptoSlam claims that only 1% of high-value traders are responsible for the bulk of trading activity on the platform, and identified over $577 million in wash-traded NFTs between February 14th and February 25th. As a result, the company has removed these transactions from its data and accused Blur of misrepresenting the NFT market.
A recent video by Youtuber PROOF discusses different topics related to the trading volume on both OpenSea and Blur. The video analyzes the behavior of long-term holders on Blur and investigates the impact of the incentives provided by Blur's airdrop program on trading behavior. Although the video does not suggest that the trading volumes of the Blur NFT market are fake, the presenter discusses whether flippers or real buyers are driving the trading volume on Blur.
As the NFT market continues to evolve, Blur's future success hinges on its ability to address concerns surrounding potential market manipulation and maintain its competitive edge. Both skeptics and supporters have been analyzing trading volume and user behavior. It remains to be seen whether Blur can sustain its growth and emerge as a trusted marketplace for NFT enthusiasts.